This interlocutory matter involved a question concerning the admissibility of an expert report. The final judgment can be found at Traderight (NSW) Pty Ltd (ACN 108 880 968) & Ors v Bank of Queensland Limited (ACN 009 656 740) (No 17) and 13 related matters [2014] NSWSC 55 and is referred to under the Practice Areas, Banking and Finance and Franchising that are contained on this web-site.
This interlocutory matter involved an application pursuant to UCPR r 35.2 and the issue of whether a party can refuse to produce a witness for cross-examination after their affidavit has been read in Court. The final judgment can be found at Traderight (NSW) Pty Ltd (ACN 108 880 968) & Ors v Bank of Queensland Limited (ACN 009656 740) (No 17) and 13 related matters [2014] NSWSC 55 and is referred to under the Practice Areas, Banking and Finance and Franchising that are contained on this web-site.
This interlocutory matter involved a question concerning the admissibility of an expert's report. The final judgment can be found at Traderight (NSW) Pty Ltd (ACN 108 880 968) & Ors v Bank of Queensland Limited (ACN 009 656 740) (No 17) and 13 related matters [2014] NSWSC 55 and is referred to under the Practice Areas, Banking and Finance and Franchising that are contained on this web-site.
This interlocutory matter involved a question concerning what evidence parties were entitled to lead concerning claims based on contraventions of section 52 of the Trade Practices Act and section 42 of the Fair Trading Act. The final judgment can be found at Traderight (NSW) Pty Ltd (ACN 108 880 968) & Ors v Bank of Queensland Limited (ACN 009 656 740) (No 17) and 13 related matters [2014] NSWSC 55 and is referred to under the Practice Areas, Banking and Finance and Franchising that are contained on this web-site.
This matter involved a dispute concerning a contract of sale relating to a hotel. Allegations of breach of duty by a broker, breach of fiduciary duty and misleading and deceptive conduct together with issues of reliance were also raised in the proceedings. The matter also included an application to vacate the hearing as well as contested claims of privilege over certain documents.
