These proceedings involved a contested interlocutory application to strike out various paragraphs of a statement of claim filed in the Supreme Court of Western Australia.
These proceedings involved a contested interlocutory application to strike out various paragraphs of a statements of claim filed in the Supreme Court of Western Australia.
These proceedings involved a contested interlocutory application to strike out various paragraphs of a statements of claim filed in the Supreme Court of Western Australia.
This interlocutory matter involved an application to strike out various paragraphs of a number of statements of claim which were filed in proceedings commenced by a number of franchisees of the Bank of Queensland and persons associated with them against the Bank and persons associated with it. The final judgment can be found at Traderight (NSW) Pty Ltd (ACN 108 880 968) & Ors v Bank of Queensland Limited (ACN 009 656 740) (No 17) and 13 related matters [2014] NSWSC 55 and is referred to in more detail under the Practice Areas, Banking and Finance and Franchising contained on this web-site.
This matter included an application that the proceedings be struck out or stayed.
This matter involved significant claims for damages for alleged breach of provisions of the Sale of Goods Act and for misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to dairy milking equipment that had been purchased. It also involved an application to strike out the proceedings.
This matter involved a number of interlocutory applications seeking to strikeout parts of the statement of claim and defence.
This matter involved an application to strike-out a statement of claim pursuant to Supreme Court Rules, Part 15, rule 26 and, alternatively, an application that the proceedings be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rules, Part 33, rule 6(2).
This matter involved a strike-out application made pursuant to Supreme Court Rules, Part 15, rule 26. It also involved an application that summary judgment be entered for the plaintiff pursuant to Supreme Court Rules, Part 13 rule 2 and, in the alternative, that default judgment be entered for the plaintiff pursuant to Supreme Court Rules, Part 17 rule 2(d).
This matter involved a contested strike-out application.
